Communis error facit jus
imperfection make it a law, I foreseeing the relationship between the imperfection and its dialect towards law.
Concordare leges legibus est optimus interpretandi modus
it is like such, i might see that the agreement among laws might be started with the skills of the interpretations.
Through the wise talk
Is law Priori or postpriori?
From the theory of experiential orientation of such cause, I might thought it might be partial priori, in one hand, determined by truth described as the name, the virtue; in another hand, it might be partial postpriori, determined by actuality, called the name as Justice and judgement.
In my own opinion, the law might be blind, executive, and deductive, presumptive possibility, there should have teleological dialect to trace its cause, then we could figure out what is transgression and what is salvation.
Since the law always judges with righteousness, it does not care mercy only until when its terms turn out to be unrighteous against its own cause. Therefore, this is reason why we need proverbs in law to bring reflection and contemplation.
Thus, In my opinion, the insight towards law is not in dealing with literally right and wrong. in moral senses, but a current temporary moral deduction of the possibly damn and condemn by such terms in mental guidance, through redeeming the virtue through such per-assumptive and actual justice to confirm the action rather than thought, that is to say, what was to be condemned is due to the conscience it opposite in actions, which derived from minds and possible twisted recognition at sub-stages of the virtue and its derivatives in socialization and moralization.
Hence, the perfection is not regards to the terms of the content which is a precise condemning mental guidance, instead, the perfection should be achieved between the dialect between tools of condemnation and its opposite conscience...
Then, between the interpretation of the law and such cause of the law, we might find the possibility for the dialect that might determines settings between the condemn and conscience in dealing with the cause about its conditioning.
That is to say, the teleological insight in Law might help us outline what is naturally to be and what is made to be, then we could recognize the Stigma between the cause and consequence. Then our concern would not be on the orders or the only judgement toward law but a insight it brought up with, that is, the history and Stigma.
This stigma should be the mental instrument we might concern as the transition between time to time, and between termination and its origin.
I might think such Stigma is not a conditioning concept, but a dynamic experiential actions and adjustments when it was firstly departed from the law of nature, between the mind and the reality, that the dialect and teleology might presence such great blue print on how those actions and power taken places which is differentiated from the thought, when it brought the sufficient proof to condemn in one's consequential action...
Hence, as Libra, I realize that on the scale of the Libra of the law, might stands for such dynamic balance between condemnation and conscience, and the focus is how those dynamism achieve the justice of the virtue.
Since what to be made condemned is for shame and guilt, then the conscience is to be made out of such shame, that is to say, one's guilt might be from his recognition of his unrighteous moment towards his original virtue. The virtue is with truth, the we would realize that the condemnation and conscience is ruler for measure.
Hence the second purpose of such dynamism is to measure, then any emphasize on either side might lost the balance of one's realization of the virtue of the truth.
That is, in the end, the law only judges, it is with righteousness, and measure what could be measured, that is, without condemnation, there is no salvation. it is nothing about the true righteousness of the condemnation, but it is about the true righteousness of such measurement in condemnation, which brought the recognition towards transgression.
Then the soul should be concerning on Virtue of Truth as the Dialect it brought up, rather on dwell on the tools of such measurement. Then the suffering of such measurement is the cause for salvation: your soul would be taken care of, even under such stigma.... since it is just a dislocation of the shame and guilt rather than dislocation of a soul....