The initial comparation between English spirituality and Latino spirituality through epistemology

In my opinion the difference of English spirituality and Latino spirituality is that the English concerned on faith and its impact into minds and environment it worked with virtue and a priori alot to certain its cause by not content but faith (hence the construction content is for external impact with precision in expression with its original reflection)， namely purity of virtue and cause in structural mind for manifestation

Hence in the dimension of the psychology and philosophy, there might be a presetting of the conceptual 'light' and glory as transcendence touch for one's witness towards such purity and origins. There might be clear boundaries between the purity and impurity by consciousness, by pursuing such innate innocence by all reverted forgiveness of such originality. The much return might be strongly emphasized on the remembrance of such purity, regardless the environmental settings but imposing strongly with such faith with mental techniques to initial the environment through such original recognition of the purity. The colonialism actually reflected such facts of the determined faith in the history, however, by the terms of the use, the transition in modern time might turn those colonial orientation (deontologic terms of use ) into the education, which is cling to the faith system it uniquely formed. it is art to form the reality through the ideal, to visionalize the ideal into order impact of the limits.

Then Latino spirituality concerned on minds and its condemnation through dialect on 'postpriori' determination with reflection rather than accuser， bring back one's concern of guilt through mind by focusing on consequence one 's bias return to soft correction through mind but with salvation myth. There seems existed blurred lines between the purity and impurity, since the cause and consequence have been contained in the psyche which is safe and distinguished through the logic for determining such priority.

like such, its terms of use is like the special theological logic applied in daily wisely say to distinguish the impurity and purity through a sophistical innate dialect, it seems to be a inherent value to visualized the light and truth not trough the terms of use, but through a mental guidance with words, to light area where there is darkness with pious in one's faith, in order to make a integration of current cause and consequence in a mythical inspiration unconsciously for return, which might leads to the actions and impulse to reach the justification between condemnation, recognition of the ego and reconciliation with social measurement. Since the measurement is for the content of the experiential, but the secret restoration is the mythical operation between the sin, crime, society. shame, guilt and impulse of such instinctive reaction , engaged with a great plan..

Therefore, the return is the soft correction, by half condemnation in the words, which contained the half-half philosophical and divine intercourse. this turn out to be different from English's clear distinguished terms of use and structural explanations of such original purity.

Indue, one is nature by faith, one is nature by words.

Hence the legal ascription is the instrument of the ego observation, not a real pious, rather than one's wisdom towards words and acceptance for working on cause. it is art through the limits to reach a whole.

Then I realized that between those 2 different language system, Greek philosophy and their determination of the knowledge, such as the structure of the cause de knowledge, and teleological deduction and coding in the language, might really form a bridge. it might help to distinguish the concern on different interpretation and content of the measurement no matter in interpretation, explanation, recognition law and society.

Strongly this Greek and Latino mixed philosophical terms have been properly formed in the middle age French, which brought much strong crusher between Germanic middle English and Latino like middle French with proper Greek cultivation in literature, philosophy as well as in the theology, aside with heritage of the Celtic culture before the Christendom..