Transcendence means to 'climbing up', beyond its boundaries. Personally I realized that the the nature of the dialectical materialism is to avoid the certainty of the limits of the law. Towards them, the higher law intersects their intersected communion and value to bring up with the new forms of the social forces to determine the new law. That is, the law is not merely deductive, not merely nominated, but indeed the certainty of the stuff and the person.
Descendence from the Aquinus, such Dialogue seems effectively probes into the nature of the state into consideration higher existance between the order and human orders.
However, more and more, we started to realize that such 'legal escapism' might not properly reconcile themself with own root justice, that is the conflict between the ideal and the coded law with actuality. As the consequence, the ideal becomes a victims and impetuous ideology in the society to be excuted as castration. The mix group and individual ideal and wishes detoriated such situation, that is, the blurred line between the limits of the mortal (the real) and the immortal (ideal).
question: Is constitution dialectical?
What is the harmony between dialectical materialism with coded law?
Could dialectical materialism derive legal termination by words? or is it just a potential insight of evolution and supreme vision towards higher law?
Does Propertarianism insert the insight of the justice, relatively towards the measurement in actuality towards the non-workers appropriate value with injustice?
In a socialist society where no class would own the means of production and be in a position to appropriate the value produced by labourers. so What would be the measure towards such appropriate in the insight of the justice in law?
Is it the the soft authority, charted with certificate (real authority never need qualification), called institution?
since the trasgression of the actual law might determine the direction of the ideal, which is free from the castration.