as most of the concerns, that the reason is uncompleted, that is to say according to the knowledge and its derived judgement we might only see through the reality in a uncompleted level, due to the transcendence of the absolute, it might stands for the 'choice' from those interpreted deductive themselves.
Indeed the reality still contain the sense in immediate and unconscious domain, then the following question would be, could the unconsciousness becoming reality? In my perspective, unconsciousness is not a projected assumption, but indeed existed in the immediate perceptive level in subjective idealism, which indicates the irrational part, and the reason it could be reality is due to it contains the attributes of the truth, manifested as senses and illusion, that is to say sense and its unconsciousness might be reality, but the illusion and its unconsciousness might be twisted version of the reality,which by means that it might have been mis-interpreted by perception, which did not mean it might not true.
Still the reality might be subjected to the absolute divine ideal, as archetypes, manifested as the infinite diffusion in imperfect level, blends such infinite possibility, then its imperfect diversification might yields different adoption towards schematic adoption of value appropriation reveals most of the concerns, that the reason is uncompleted, that is to say according to the knowledge and its derived judgement we might only see through the reality in a uncompleted level, due to the transcendence of the absolute, it might stands for the 'choice' from those interpreted deductive themselves.
Indeed the reality still contain the sense in immediate and unconscious domain, then the following question would be, could the unconsciousness becoming reality? In my perspective, unconsciousness is not a projected assumption, but indeed existed in the immediate perceptive level in subjective idealism, which indicates the irrational part, and the reason it could be reality is due to it contains the attributes of the truth, manifested as senses and illusion, that is to say sense and its unconsciousness might be reality, but the illusion and its unconsciousness might be twisted version of the reality,which by means that it might have been mis-interpreted by perception (shirkir), which did not mean it might not true, but a dislocated source manifestation, which might lead us to the better understanding in those dynamic -- character and their custom- formations relations with their metaphysic righteousness with patterns of the irrational morality.
Still the reality might be subjected to the absolute divine ideal, as archetypes, manifested as the infinite diffusion in imperfect level, blends such infinite possibility, with virtue that turn out to be static; then its imperfect diversification might yields different adoption towards schematic adoption of value appropriation regards to its diversifications, it is my idea towards concept of 'design' and its correlation with such schematic adoption and diversifications.
as sort of the concerns, I might agree with the armour that there might not exist 'infinite mind', but only 'infinite realization and interpretation' according to the infinite characters and quality of the universe, then the 'infinite possibility' might need to be subjected to the manifestation of the 'static virtue' with their archetypes, the diversification stands for the diversification of the defect and imperfect diversifications (sin), which would be either occurred in immediate and mediate perceptive level towards such subject, through different diffusion and different schematic elements.