I have reviewed the film 'Revolutionary road' and it drives me deeply reflection towards the human condition as harm, but indeed by shocking from the plot of the movie, I actually did not sense quite sadness from the movie, there is no emotional echos and no wondered tear eyes, but i was slightly confused, what was that sort of heaviness, that was as gravity secured by concerns on gentle awakening, that is nothing social fabrication is changing or under revolution, but it did start the reflection, mental and spiritual revolution in actual, by taking the tragedy of the plot and characters. it sensation is so sincere, quiet, impressive for the partaking depressions they encounter, which those expression could not be spoken or expressed. Just like what Apil has mentioned, that life was depressed, with no approach towards the ideal (France) and no fulfillment towards the real (America). And she was really like a puppet in the end to be summoned for all she could either express or become as who she really is under the social value that is on 'unceasing promotions for the work you do not either wish to do then fill that emptiness with adultery to replace their real intention of their role play in life, ending with house purchasing or ever like...' In the end of the movie, after Apil died due to her self abortion to her own child in the consequence of the blood lead. it is very interesting that no one would feel sadness by the tragedy coming as posterior but only as the fall of the ideal of France. The abortion has already occurred in spiritual or mental level, like castration which any consequential of all the failure would not cause change and sadness since it has already fallen in the level of the ideal. The Agony is just on the level of how to return, but not modification or fulfill. the first falling making every thing suddenly so cruel, hence it seems likely that nothing coming as aid would modify such sorrow, we called that mercy, mercy of Christ, That is one of sorrow in divine level which could be never be feed, between the human condition and the ideal itself, hence that field bear the mercy and compassion between human condition and divine ideal, which we call it as the Humanity de Christos. So it would become so peaceful for audience accept the abortions and the death, since it felt so fatal and inevitable and so relief of that heaviness of the depressions. But it is peaceful internally but cause a shocking invisible spiritual spasm outside of all the people involved with it. Just like in the end of the movie, the lady used to commend on their properties that , 'after the death of April, so many things changes, it seems likely that they are such a good couple and not deserve such, but their house become so hard to be sold, that the windows, the.......' it actually caused the directly shock towards his husband who listened what she said and he is also on the revolutionary awakening. After the movie, I was driven into deep thought but I came up with nothing and there is no emotion or mind but just felt enlightened. until today I started to think about the theory of the Kekes 'Facing evil', that is, I coming all those hidden mental stream into the light. Sudden inspiration from the the book 'Facing evil from the conservative author Kekes, as his proposed ideal towards the definition towards the evil 'as the undeserved harm'. Hence I created two categories towards it as, category of the harm and category of the evil. Hence the justice of the harm becomth the justice of the evil. But i did not agree with his opinion on the tragedy caused by harm is vulnerable. I did not regard the tragedy is vulnerable, but it is fatal, inevitable, treated as the interpretation of the harm as the object. Since the tragedy is the fruit of the harm, that is the harm is prior, and it has already made detriment to any human condition before the tragedy partakes, Hence there is no worth of the tragedy, but it is an expression of the parking harm as it makes the tragedy fatal as such harm (fall, and sin). then into the category of the harm, I divided the harm into just harm and unjust harm. Just harm caused by the sin, as punishment, and it would be revived by the divine law and divine restriction, while the unjust harm is real evil rather than nominal evil as harm, which it has negotiated with the worth of the harm, and this matters with one's will of choice (free will and its degree of partaking of the sin), it might witness salvation of the will as the choice. and any choice under this mercy always serves (that is there is no such difference when he moved to France or stayed in US that witness the death of his wife, since the service of mercy is the same).