It is not proper for Christian value to be secularised in to public filed as political secularisation since it might bring the blurred line between the glory and the virtue. It might have suspicious issue in corporeal issue of creator manifested in public sphere. The public is much a ideological or recognition natural sphere, it might stand for the idea of recognition and virtue through nature of being born. Hence it might exist the fused concept between secularisation and missionary. Indeed I felt that Christian value is a very domestic domain, while public should be a place for crucifix and salvation. Hence just like Rousseau addressed if one government which is so perfect ideally, that it is not suit for human but gods. More over, how the invisible kingdoms stands on the nature through its ideal in operation without crucifix in real? Such secularisation might under estimated the price of the crucifix between the ideal and the real, or it might be highly offended by treason, just like what Judah has done in the gospel, as the betrayed price of the land that carried sin, when the law written on it is not ideal.